Monthly Archives: January 2015


By now, you may have seen this: 

[…] an “ongoing pattern of disobedient, hostile and defiant behavior,” symptoms include questioning authority, negativity, defiance, argumentativeness, and being easily annoyed.

Music fanfare: (6:45) 


Here’s why I am angry about authority:

I have a deep sense of having been betrayed.

Everything I have been told by authority since I can remember has tuned out to be a lie.


Were my parents uninformed, deluded, in denial?  I’ll be kind and say that they were misled. I could be more harsh and say that they were complicit, at least through their own willful inattention.  That they were the victims of a poor education, or from having drunk the Koolaid, is a possibility.  But my father grew up within rock-throwing distance of Yale, and my step-mother belonged to a family whose patriarch is alleged to have been involved in MK-Ultra ritual sex abuse circles.

Can I prove that?  No, the references have been scrubbed off the Internet, but his picture grabbed from that article, the one that sent autonomic shivers of recognition down my persona the first time I saw it, still stares out at me from deep inside my hard drive. Was I directly involved?  Not to my conscious knowledge.  Indeed, it can be argued that my step-mother did what she could to keep me safely away from such depredations, and perhaps that is the deep dark inner family secret no one wants to talk about. But she still whupped me regularly, and abused me psychologically, and one person with the requisite experience and knowledge told me one thing she had done went dangerously near a line that no adult should ever cross.

Were my teachers uninformed?  No, but individuals can’t do much in a system in which they are constantly watched, guided, harangued, and given boundaries.

Were my community officials complicit? Perhaps, but complicity is the group norm; otherwise your earning potential, career or lives will be made to suffer. We were all good Germans at one point in time or another.

We were the recipients of that golden glow that emanated from post-World-War-II economics; don’t rock the boat when the sea is still and placid.

Was the truth about the Illuminati and Skull and Bones available to them?  I didn’t learn about this stuff until I was into my 50’s.  Why didn’t they question what had happened in Dallas?  In the kitchen of the Ambassador Hotel? On the balcony of the Lorraine Motel? In the Gulf of Tonkin? The communal elders  dutifully packed their first-born to a quick death or a lifetime of hell on the say-so of an obviously corrupt leadership. Their children did the same a generation later.

The hints that there was a hidden structure to American polity were available, though suppressed and, I’d guess, ridiculed. The experience of American politics and culture has been to move to the middle, to be herded. Although I didn’t discovered it until he died in the late 80’s, my father had two textbooks on propaganda on his bookshelf (neatly titled for the field of public relations).

But the legislative history of the great snookering was available to them; at that point in time, I was still two decades or more from being born, but the creature came out of the seaside swamps where the robber barons secretly gathered (and the requisite legislation) occurred on their watch (albeit with covert means and subterfuge).

[More recently we were told by the Speaker of the House that Congress had to pass the bill in order to know what was in it.]

Off they went to another war, to Federal income taxes, to a debt-based system run by a bunch of foreigners. Emma Lazarus, that sheltered aristocratic Jewish poetess daughter of an Ashkenazi, and Augustus Bartholdi, a French Freemason who married his wife in that same town celebrated by Lazarus in other poems, sold us a trojan horse known as Liberty Enlightening The World.

Lazarus was “an important forerunner of the Zionist movement. She argued for the creation of a Jewish homeland thirteen years before Theodor Herzl began to use the term Zionism.[12]]

Liberty was made gentle, the French themes of revolution and armed mobs having been made to evaporate by the idea’s progenitor, French law professor and politician Édouard René de Laboulaye, according to the history published in 2003.

Authority in the forms of political, social and cultural leadership made it fashionable, even de rigeur, to be something other than what you held yourself out to be.  (This while I attended a school with the motto Nosce Te Ipsum. )

This started with the hypocrisy of the church-goers, extended into those who purported to be of various religions but were really godless and intent on destroying spiritual faith, jumped into the world of politics where it appeared to be (erroneously) an occasional aberration, oozed its way into academia, and finally subsumed politics and diplomacy to the point where the only functional approaches in use today involve theatrical performances of news-making events, and false flags. Open manipulation of personal sovereignty through MK-Ultra-like adaptation of pharmaceutical and psychological/psychiatric intervention was still an unknown but has now come sharply into focus.  On one hand, we have robots to do the work and we have kidnapped and trafficked adolescents to provide sex and other services. The latter, of course, is in the news as a service provided by governmental intelligence operatives to royal families, presidential-caliber politicians, and the like for the mans of controlling them, but I am certain our parents knew of such things; they simply averted their eyes, covered ours, but made available the salacious by-products.

In many cases, our governments have been actively engaged in profiting from and providing to the composers the deadly products of narcotic drugs, the illicit types and those prescribed by the friendly people in white lab coats, samples easily provided in bulk by BigPharma, usually delivered by some handsome and attractive “rep” along with a pricey dinner and some high-class marketing handouts.

“In government, the term authority is often used interchangeably with power. However, their meanings differ: while power is defined as “the ability to influence somebody to do something that he/she would not have done”, authority refers to a claim of legitimacy, the justification and right to exercise that power.”

As children here in the USofA, we were immersed in the history and verbiage of the Declaration of Independence and brought to a state of veneration and worship for it and the government it eventually birthed. Right behind that was an almost equal veneration of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, both now badly eroded to the point of absence, like a barrier beach in the face of waves of assault by people who seized power through stolen elections, subterfuge, and the sheer power of massed money, much of it itself illicitly gotten through investment trickeries, cheating, or flat out control of the system of currency to the point where quarter-million-dollar loans at the rapscallion rate of far less than a percent are given out privately to friends like an extra slosh of a fine wine at a cocktail party in the Hamptons.

No such loan was made available to the commoners, of course; we had to pay 29.9% APR for the several hundreds we charged on one of their credit cards when we had no other choice, and then deal with the humiliation of repeated phone calls from their hired attorney/collector until we acquiesced with a check drawn from savings. But any dumb pumpkin could turn a handsome profit with a quarter-million at 0.0001% interest in a few short weeks, if only by paying off their house instead of being foreclosed upon.

“… authority has become a subject of research in a variety of empirical settings: the family (parental authority), small groups (informal authority of leadership), intermediate organizations such as schools, churches, armies, industries and bureaucracies (organizational and bureaucratic authorities), and society-wide or inclusive organizations….”

Where were these people in the last twenty years? How was their silence and complicity bought? What legitimacy (especially true of the mainstream media) can they now command?  They are apparently all out watching celebrating the use of “naked force exercised on false pretenses” by watching “atrocity porn”

A more recent and immediate example is that the condo manager in the condo-glump where I last resided insisted that solar power hadn’t yet been proven to be of value, but this report is just the most recent indicator that she was lying, incompetent, or at worst uninformed.

To appear to be ignorant while maintaining that others are mentally ill because they are better informed is a sign of duplicitousness, or psychopathology, or self-delusion.


Merciful Succor

Merciful Succor

An employee of the city of Boston was fired Friday for taking part in protests on I-93 in Milton on Thursday that snarled traffic for miles and diverted an ambulance, according to Boston Mayor Marty Walsh.

The youth communications specialist with the Department of Youth Engagement and Employment was arrested Thursday and charged with resisting arrest, conspiracy and willfully obstructing an emergency vehicle, according to Walsh.

Walsh did not provide the name of the employee, but did confirm they were a contract worker who had been employed by the city for two months.

On Friday, a hearing was conducted with the employee which resulted in the termination of their employment, according to Walsh.

“Mayor Walsh strongly respects the right to protest and the right to free speech, however finds it unacceptable for a City employee to put public safety at risk,” a statement Saturday from Walsh’s office read.

The protests shut down Interstate 93 northbound at East Milton Square south of the city, and I-93 south at Mystic Avenue north of the city.

Some of the protesters in Milton were sitting on the highway with their arms shoulder-deep inside sealed 1,200-pound barrels that appeared to be filled with cement.

Due to the backup caused by the protests, an Easton ambulance was forced to take Richard McGrath, an 83-year-old Easton man with “life-threatening” injuries, to a hospital less-equipped to treat the patient. 


“… Firefighters first had to cut down a tree and then extricate McGrath from the vehicle, the chief said. That took about 20 minutes, and McGrath was on board a department ambulance at 8:02 a.m.

The diversion occurred about a minute later…..” 

 “Easton Fire Chief Kevin Partridge said firefighters driving the ambulance with McGrath on board were en route to Boston Medical at 8:03 AM when they were alerted to the bottleneck created by protesters who closed off the Southeast Expressway.”


Back in the day, I used to know an awful lot about ambulances and long-distance ambulance transfer and life-threatening emergencies and such like.

When I was a area and regional EMS planner/coordinator/administrator charged with the development and improvement of an EMS system, I used to be a heavy proponent of what was called EMS Grand Rounds.

Yes, lil ole me actually wrote the first statewide plan for EMS in Massachusetts, working for Sylvia Queen, who’d been appointed by Governor King.  I was a junior assistant ‘royal court bailiff’ for the office of emergency medical services in the state department of public health who was recognized to have the ability to write coherently in volume, and I was given the 15 components of an EMS system and a typewriter and a desk.

[Eventually, I also wrote the first set of first responder training regulations, a position paper that insisted on standards for free-standing emergency care centers, and an effective regional mass casualty incident response plan. For four years, I ran medical conferences in emergency medicine and trauma management for emergency physicians and emergency nurses.]

I’d cut my teeth in the ambulance business working for a large private ambulance company in the Springfield/Chicopee/Holyoke area and was the shift supervisor/dispatcher when the call came in from Boston: 

“Send me everything you got; we just had a plane crash at Logan.” [Delta Flight 273]

I said “no!”. 

I’d driven the Mass. Pike many times, sometimes two or three times a day, transferring people with “life-threatening” emergencies from local hospitals to the big centers like Massachusetts General Hospital.  

I’d pilot a Cadillac ambulance over-stuffed with attendant/EMT,  the patient,  extra special equipment,  a nurse or doctor  (sometimes both)  at 120 mph 

The day that phone call came in about Flight 273, I had at my command a fleet of 8-10 of these.

If you want to make way in a hurry on an Interstate highway at that kind of speed, there are certain techniques:

  • all lights flashing,  especially the white headlights  (illegal if installed on a personal vehicle);
  • no sirens;
  • straddling the line between lanes.

You’d think a police escort could be used but experience shows they are are much more risky than  helpful; we simply notified the State Police of our route and departure time and they watched for us as we streamed by, as did the State DPW vehicles who also had radios and could also call ahead (or backwards) to have key traffic routes identified, routes re-drawn, etc.

At 120 mph, the ride into Boston still took an hour. (You can’t do 120 for every inch of the trip. The record was fifty-five minutes. Hey, Norm! ) 

Nowadays, ambulance design and structure is more strictly regulated by the U.S. Department of Transportation and they look like a box. This is beneficial because the box has a lot more room for gear and people and it can be turned into a hospital room in miniature when necessary. 

But the boxy nature of the vehicle makes it far less likely to be driven at 120; I doubt there are many situations in which such a vehicle is brought to that kind of speed. The rollover risks would double with every added 5 mph, particularly if there’s a curve, another driver who didn’t see you, etc.  With a patient with a possibly-fractured neck or spine, you’d be looking for the least bumpy road.

But that’s okay because in today’s EMS system they’ve replaced the need for long emergency transfer by highway with trauma helicopters sometimes called MedFlight. The big trauma centers have them. Trauma is big money. Everyone wants a bigger slice.


This “Ferrari” was an upgrade to the old pick-up truck used by the trauma center in the center of the state.   


But the icing conditions that morning grounded the birds. 

On a different day, that old fellow would have been in a trauma center very quickly; these things cruise in a direct line, without having to stop for anything, at 160 mph. The birds  are hummingbirds. Landing zones are pre-planned, and drills with local EMS squads are routinely done.

So the super-sophisticated tools weren’t available; ack! what now? 

Well, the system is designed with multiple brains. You use time to think, and you ask others to help you think in parallel. 

[Note that I’ve also read almost three hundred books on performance psychology, team-building, and coaching, and digitized much of it into blog entries, an e-book, and more.  A re-mastering of that product line should be underway soon.]

The first brains are the people in the ambulance; the second rank are the officers and dispatchers who are aware, as we see here:  

But the fire chief wasn’t thinking fully. Yes, he was properly concerned for the patient, and the public he serves.  

He may have also been stuck in the rut of thinking that his asset and its cargo were headed into Boston, and Boston must be the destination. Boston has a very high concentration of trauma centers and because of the hub-of-the-wheel nature of the road net and the city, they’re all within blocks of each other.

Here are two lists of trauma centers in Massachusetts.  We are proud of our capacities here in Massachusetts.

Hooray for our side.

Scroll down past the application to the attachment.

Remember I mentioned   EMS   Grand  Rounds?

Nobody in Massachusetts EMS ever wanted to do them. Why?

Grand Rounds in the world of medicine are where people get called to discuss and account for their mistakes. 

You’ve undoubtedly seen a few of them on some TV medical show. They are meetings.  There’s a hierarchy, and it will make itself known soon enough.

The meetings are ones in which certain cases are presented slowly so that those in attendance can think along with the man or woman who was wearing the decision boots that day (and, yes, in medicine, and in EMS, lots of people wear decision boots across the space and time involved). 

The Department of Medicine at the Yale School of Medicine sponsors a “Writing and Medicine” Grand Rounds which features various physician-authors. 

Grand Rounds are designed for learning.  Humility is your trump suit if you’re in attendance.

I should have been called to present my case that day I said “no”. 

I can still defend that decision.

When you are on the carpet in a Grand Rounds, the heat under your collar goes up. You are under the spotlight of your peers and your teachers.  

A Grand Round is designed to examine the way you were thinking, the questions you asked, the answers you got, and the anticipated and outcomes of your decision. When attended by many people from throughout the system and the state, everyone learns more. 

Here, in this case, we had a number of people involved.

[Note that my experience also includes the early development of CME events online for physicians, learning about building “communities of practice” online, as a beta-tester for the e-mail based six-week-long “Games of Games” developed by a consultant in organizational development, and being the subject matter expert in the development of a PC-to-PC five-play game focused on emergency management.]

My distress as a knowledgeable blogger is that the politicians got involved after the fact; the system leaders spoke out sharply, like the Mass. State Police colonel.

The Mayor of Boston found a scapegoat so he could send a message to city employees. But neither the Mass. State Police colonel nor the Mayor of the City of Boston had or have a role in the case, or in the EMS system.  


A third and wholly-different brain is involved in EMS and it serves as the system’s corpus callosum. 

Called CMEDs, there are five of them scattered throughout the state and their role is to enable controlled conversation among numerous parties, especially between doctors and ambulances. CMED stands for central medical emergency direction. A CMED maintains numerous status boards and can tell at a glance or with a radio or phone conversation what is going on anywhere within the state. 

CMED Centers play a role in coordinating EMS communications by:

assisting EMS field personnel with communication during emergencies

managing Medical radio channel usage

maintain a clear procedure for EMS communications within a region

connecting EMS field personnel to local Emergency Departments and Medical direction

providing interoperability with other public safety agencies


CMED (Central Medical Emergency Direction) relies on a network of radio towers set up strategically throughout [the state].. Through these towers… an ambulance can contact CMED via radio and request entry notification to a hospital of destination. This provides physician access and ensures that the emergency department is aware of the patient’s pending arrival. CMED also plays an important role in coordinating EMS response to Mass Casualty Incidents and patient distribution from the scene to the hospital. CMED is crucial to the coordination of communications between ambulances and hospitals and ultimately contributes to optimal patient care.


So the other thing you need for your Grand Rounds case notebook is a map of Massachusetts and perhaps a modicum of familiarity with its road net.  But you can work with simple distance scales and you’ll have everything you need. Get out your favorite online mapping tool, zero in on Southeast Massachusetts, and place the pins or colored dots where you need to, and think through the process. 

 Remember you have a little time (the poor fellow had to be carved out of his vehicle before they could load him into an ambulance and, meanwhile, at least three of four nerve centers of the state EMS system could have been put to work thinking out the simple answer.)  

[The simple answer is in one of the links; I’ll provide it to you at the end.]

So I call bullshit on the politicians and everyone else on down and say simply “spend more time making your system work and the diversion would not have had to have happened”.  Instead, like so many things these days, this case has been turned into a political bludgeon. 


Should the protestors have been chained to the barrels in the middle of the highway at rush hour?  


Before I answer the question, I’d ask the State Police colonel in a uniform widely-recognized and respected, and the Mayor of Boston in his first term of office in a city where black kids get shot regularly on the streets, to consider that,  just six weeks agoa former USAF pilot in special operations, someone among Esquire Magazine’s “Best and Brightest”, and author of a book on open source warfare, published a blog entry with clear directions on the use of GPS-guided drones which could carry  a payload of over half-a kilogram of caltrops that “can shut down automobile traffic on major highways for hours.”

Good thing terrorists can’t read this stuff, I guess, huh? 

Oh, look, another reason to shut down the Internet, the global grand rounds for everything.

“Will the FAA effort to control drones protect against this type of disruption?  No.  It won’t.” 


So my answer to the questionShould the protestors have been chained to the barrels in the middle of the highway at rush hour?” is

“Hell, yes.”

You wanna know why?  

Because most of what passes for leadership these days has to be hit over the head with a 2×4 just to get their attention.

Sometimes it takes repeated application. Politicians have forgotten how to communicate. 

Because they are so busy being hung up on their own role or their own image or their own power, they haven’t a frickin’ clue about how good this society could be if it didn’t spend its time making war, war weapons, standing up to hide war criminals, criminalizing rights that are supposed to be engraved within the Constitution, or otherwise providing justice and simple direct service to its people. 

They don’t have the slightest idea how to achieve excellence. 

They are mired in petty and destructive mediocrity, and people are getting sick of it. 

For me, this isn’t about disrespecting authority, or being an anarchist.  

This is about somehow, despite everything that has gone down in the last decade and a half, still maintaining a kernel of respect for authority and government. 

That kernel has been beaten down into the size of a tiny seed, but it’s still a seed; there is still enough respect for authority and government to ask them to do a better job.


The answer to the question about what the ambulance/firefighter crew should have done, by the way, is simply thinking outside the box. 

In the actual event, there should have been a steady and calm cross-talk among dispatchers, State Police traffic status systems, CMED’s, and emergency/trauma doctors. 

Everyone that day was thinking inside the box 

The distance from Easton to Boston is 29 miles and requires an estimated 40 minutes driving time, according to

The distance from Easton to that other trauma center is 28 miles and requires an estimated 33 minutes driving time.

That other trauma center is in one of the oldest cities in the United States and is the third-largest city in the New England region after Boston and Worcester. A religious exile from the original colony named it in honor of God’s merciful Providence. 

Mr. McGrath would also have found the required medical mercy at Rhode Island Hospital, a Level I Trauma Center located in Providence, RI.   (2:57)

Maybe the rest of us can find  manifestation of divine care or direction, prudent management of resources, and foresight

when the politicians stop talking and start listening. 

Leave of Absence

I will be on an unpaid leave of absence for a minimum of five days. Call it R&R.

I just had a major creative breakthrough that precedes by a day or so a necessary stoppage point for a minor medical procedure beyond which I will carry this new idea (really the merger of two or three other goals).  

It will eventually require a transition away from the almost-daily tracking of the follies, fallacies and feliatio-usness of the people who have placed themselves by means of cognitive and inter-personal fraud into the leadership roles of this planet.  

It is a radical turn into the stiff headwinds of my own creativity.

 What heaven brought me canot be forgotten. 

Keep calm and shake up your own world. 

Make everything and everyone around you a work of art by starting with yourself.

Communications in the 21st Century

Image from


This entry is a collection of serial interconnected posts presented as built-in PDFs and which is focused on communications in the 21st century, i.e. mass media and social media, since the year 2000.

It uses two books as primary vehicles or frameworks.

The first is a book entitled “Communications in the 21st Century”, the collected proceedings from a major symposia sponsored by the USC Annenberg School of Communications and the Darden School of Business at the Unversity of Virginia. [The schools are further delineated at the very beginning of Bell Comm 21 Two.]

I first encountered this book 35 years ago when I was in grad school.

The first of the four posts in the series will show up as a pdf entitled Bell Comm 21 One; this is essentially the introduction to the book with a sidebar pdf on the three men who edited it: The Three Editors”.

Bell Comm 21 One also includes something about the prologue and its author; the essential theme of the symposia (a look ahead to the promise of the new millennium and the expected effects of the emerging technologies of cable and satellite television, interactive videodiscs, and the social media); and their effects and impact on community.

I chose to zero in on two articles:

“Finding One’s Place in a Multimedia Society”: I thought it ought to be interesting to look back to what was foreseen 35 years ago as we walk around with our smart phones, tablets, or other androids driving away from our wired multi-media homes in “connected” cars, immersed in a world in which virtually (pardon the pun) everything we do and say is surveilled by the state, mega-industry giants, commercial business, and even the city.  The Internet of everything arrived this weekend.

The second article was “The Subversive Subspecies”.

Authors’ bios are included.

There is also a small pdf listing 12 articles which may be of further interest from within a collection of academic papers on the social and behavioral aspects of communications that is worth a quick scan. It’s called Communications Commons.

I chose to ignore

  • Herbert Schiller’s article “The Free-Flow Doctrine: Will It Last Into the 21st Century?”,
  • Arno Penzias’ piece “Friendly Interfaces”;
  • John Robinson’s article “Will The New Electronic Media Revolutionize our Daily Lives”, and
  • “The Real Meaning of Communications” by Lawrence Halprin.

All of those, as well as the little gem by Amory Lovins and L. Hunter Lovins entitled “The Writing on the Wall”, are worth your time or perhaps ought to be fodder for a follow-up post.

We still haven’t read the writing on the wall, perhaps because, societally, we are lead away from doing so.

Arno Penzias sums up his article in the last sentence:

“A friendly interface between people and machines requires a friendly interface between a free society and its scientific and technical community.”

Halprin’s little piece danced through and around his experience as a landscape and space planner and introduced his RSVP cycles:

“Without a sense of participation, there cannot be any group creativity….

Whenever communications are discussed, there is always a lot of talk about common language.

If you can put people into positions in which they share an experience – experience on a deep level – that in itself is the most powerful form of common language I can possibly imagine.”

To explore this more, see:

A side-trip might include this discussion paper “The Information Technology Enabled Organization: A Major Social Transformation in the U.S.A.” also available in French and Spanish, two views from opposite ends of the spectrum on the information revolution. To place its analysis in context, “the paper presents the ideas of a modern-day Booster and a modern-day Obstructionist:

•Arno Penzias in his book Harmony: Business, Technology, & Life After Paperwork (1995), and

•Jeremy Rifkin in his book The End of Work: The Decline of the Global Labor Force and the Dawn of the Post-Market Era (1995).”


Bell Comm 21 Two is simply a collection of supporting and exploratory links that looks at the two Annenberg Schools of Communication, Walter Annenberg himself, the USC School of Journalism and its director, and then transitions into a collection of articles and posts from the Internet about related topics. These include:

  • a sidebar pdf entitled Photoshopping The Gaza War;
  • how the CIA has been involved in shaping public opinion;
  • the phenomenon of comments and commenting;
  • technologies used to fool, coordinate and manage;
  • propaganda;
  • Facebook;
  • trolls;
  • online surveillance;
  • filtering, censorship and perception management on the Net;
  • spam;
  • the concentration of media ownership;
  • information and world-view battles online;
  • Twitter as a social and political tool;
  • smart phones; and
  • portable media.

This, of course, scratches the surface; it was a sampling taken during a short stretch of time early last fall and since then.

I also ignored the little article on media events, but it was of enough interest 35 years later later that I went in search of the book that that little article had forecast and which was published in 1994.

That book forms the meat of the third and fourth segments called Bell Comm 21 Three and Bell Comm 21 Four.


Pdfs here:

Bell Comm 21 One

The Three Editors

Communications Commons


Bell Comm 21 Two

Photoshopping The Gaza War



Bell Comm 21 Three

Bell Comm 21 Four



I’ve packed some music to help you through the foothills and mountain ranges of reading.


Telegraph Road (full studio version: 14:17)

Marie’s Mood

Nina Simone

Stanley Clarke – Concerto For Jazz – Rock Orchestra (14:08)

No Doubt About It (Jimmy Smith, 7:10)

72 minutes of Midnight Buddha Cafe smooth jazz

Nadejda Yotzova – piano

Borislav Yotzov – conductor

State Phylharmony Orchestra Ruse/Bulgaria

Bulgarian National Television-2

November 2013 (27:06)

Endless (15:32)

Someone who rode under the banner of speaking truth to power once told me that the single largest problem that we as a society face is that we don’t know how to talk to one another.

Maybe some of the articles noted here will get someone off dead center:

Chomsky-like, using silo thinking, she felt that there were greater issues to concern one’s self with than the fact that it’s been fairly evident that our own governments and political movements and wealthy activists have been engineering internal domestic chaos and international wars (suspected and documented in that one little case and systematically and historically noted in cases going back well over 100 years) but she was not interested in mitigating or addressing such concerns.

She is now a global ecopsychological crisis and grief counselor, so diss your wife, smack your child, ignore the  war-of-the-week program and the murder-at-will policies and read about the leaders of the world working their way through Krafft-Ebing’s manual.

There are many paths for denial and destruction.

I have a theory (and people like Arthur Silber and Derrick Jensen have been pounding away at this for a long time) that the rigid authoritarianism and abusive actions (e.g., torture) of our global leaders and elite have their roots in the psycho-dynamics of the home and the family. More than a few parents are pathologically ill or troubled, and too many of them get away with it at home and then put it into action among like-minded people when they get to the office. And their kids grow up to be just like them.

Maybe Jung agrees:

“The psychopathology of the masses is rooted in the psychology of the individual”

C.G. Jung, Essays on Contemporary Events, 1936-46

“Today psychopathy reveals itself ever more clearly as a social epidemic and, more precisely, a socio-communicational one. If you want to survive you have to be competitive and if you want to be competitive you must be connected, and receive and process continuously an immense and growing mass of data. This provokes a constant attentive stress, a reduction of the time available for affectivity.

These two tendencies, inseparably linked, provoke an effect of devastation on the individual psyche: depression, panic, anxiety, the sense of solitude and existential misery. …

[P]sychopathology is exploding in the center of the social scene.”

Franco Bifo Berardi, Precarious Rhapsody: Semocapitalism and the Pathologies of the Post-Alpha Generation